ICP and Ton dominate blockchain speed rankings in April with the best TPS

• ICP and Ton lead April with the very best TPS supported by quick blocking occasions and highly effective consumer exercise.
• Solana, avalanche, and Avalanche present center tier efficiency that’s far behind the highest two in transaction speeds.
• Ethereum and Bitcoin are low at TPS, highlighting the scalability hole and new blockchains.

New blockchain efficiency information from Phoenix Group reveals that in April 2025, Web computer systems (ICP) and Toncoin (TON) achieved the best common transaction (TPS), surpassing all different networks. This determine offers an in depth view of how key blockchains are scaled as consumer exercise and utility demand will increase, creating clear disparities in throughput capabilities.

In keeping with the info, ICP led all networks with a mean TPS of 4,800. Ton continued carefully at 4,300 TPS. These outcomes far outweigh each blockchains when it comes to transaction throughput. This report attributes a part of this effectivity to fast blocking occasions. The ICP averaged 480 ms per block, whereas Ton accomplished the block in simply 390 ms.

Equally, the outcomes confirmed a excessive stage of consumer engagement within the TON case. This introduced the variety of lively addresses to 13.7 million in April, the best of all tracked blockchains. For instance, Solana has 3 million lively addresses, which isn’t stunning because it hardly reaches your TPS checklist.

The excessive pace and exercise ranges of TON and ICP point out that these networks deal with large-scale operations with consistency which are probably enabled by optimized consensus protocols and infrastructure.

Important discount in mid-tier efficiency

The TPS outcomes confirmed that the efficiency blockchain is on the prime, whereas the remaining blockchains ranked under the highest two. With reference to AATP, Solana was third greatest at 95.8 TPS, with the closest protocol being second at 81.7 TPS and Avalanche was third at 70.4 TPS. Each of those networks commerce on distributed utility improvement and good contract platforms, however throughput exhibits a big hole in transaction charges.

SUI was second on this regard, with 66.6 transactions in a second adopted by Polygon, with TPS of fifty.4 and Arbitrum of TPS of 46.6. Each assist a number of Decentralized Monetary (DEFI) and Web3 environments. Nonetheless, the info exhibits that it isn’t even near ICP and TON when it comes to the variety of transactions per second.

Supply: x

Particularly, Ethereum, the second largest blockchain based mostly on market capitalization, has a TPS of simply 3.5. It will lead to considerably decrease pace stakes than new opponents. The penalty highlights that Ethereum continues to deal with its throughput bottlenecks because it strikes in the direction of scaling options like roll-ups.

Equally, Bitcoin was one of many lowest networks, with a reported TPS of 4.7. Though broadly used as a worthwhile retailer, its primary transaction throughput lags behind speed-optimized chains.

Tron, BNB Chain, and Cardano additionally recorded reasonable TPS values, indicating a extra balanced trade-off between pace, safety, and decentralization. These chains didn’t expertise sufficient efficiency enchancment metrics to create a listing of the highest 10, however are nonetheless concerned in different community developments.

The information accessible within the Phoenix Group additionally included parameters apart from TPS. Common block time and lively addresses supplied higher perception into the exercise of every community. These indicators point out that TPS is a crucial causal indicator, however don’t exist alone. Incorporating the views of Ton and Solan respectively, quick block occasions and lively customers place clamps at end-to-end speeds throughout the blockchain system.